Request For Comments.
We need your feedback for some things concerning the site.
Please read the following;
http://forums.atomic-systems.com/viewtopic.php?p=42427&sid=34d1c9c9bf33d1e4e3f30c26416c607f#42427
and give your suggestions.
We need your feedback for some things concerning the site.
Please read the following;
http://forums.atomic-systems.com/viewtopic.php?p=42427&sid=34d1c9c9bf33d1e4e3f30c26416c607f#42427
and give your suggestions.
Hi folks, I recieved this (abbreviated) email this morning from our payment provider in relation to paying for our Premium Subscription; Dear Clients: iBill apologizes for the technical difficulties you have experienced over the last several days with our payment processing network. Please rest assured that transactions are still being processed through our system. Our…
The proposed changes to the web server config file have now been made. It’s a fair bit more efficient in there now, and more importantly, I can actually (mostly!) read it. It was like a ruddy birds nest before! The httpd process size has dropped by about 1Meg (meaning it should scale a bit better)…
Ok, after all the pain of the last week you’d think I’d be over it… I am. But I have to move to a new server because otherwise DearDiary will be on a server on its own and it can’t afford to pay for that – so it has to go where all the other…
Just a couple of answers to some of the recurring questions and themes in comments after our about-turn announcement in the previous entry. Unauthenticated Comments: These will not be switched off. There are a huge number more people that value this facility than the couple of babies on the site that continue to misuse it….
First Place: 1 year subscription – Calantha Second Place: 6 month subscription – Alifelessordinary Third Place: 3 month subscription – JanuaryGirl Other notable entries: 1 month subscriptions (unless already awarded above) AbbyNormalJanuaryGirlJanuaryGirlCalanthaCalanthaLabyrinthFroggy02012000TravoriCottonClouds A note from the judges: First off, FANTASTIC entries folks. Some of the entries not mentioned above will still be used in the…
I agree that it is too much for one person to do. I’ll give it more thought, but one suggestion would be to form some sort of committee to handle such things. By gathering a group of users who are familiar with the system, you would have a democratic way to resolve disputes and determine if policies are being broken.
Hope this helps!
[PRIVATE COMMENT]
a group of persons helping to resolve disputes is a good idea, however, choosing who would be in this group will be a bit difficult. perhaps a stronger rule such as the following will deter those who hide behind a monitor and keyboard from taking it as far as what i and other users have had to deal with recently: i feel that once there is valid proof that any user has crossed from online to offline to harass another diarist/user…that person should automatically lose their privileges to write at this site. there have been many many arguments, disputes, etc, etc, etc, between diarists here and eventually they came to a resolution. noone, however, should have to deal with harassment at their workplace. this entire situation forced me to involve security, my boss, and staff members. it also affected the library’s homepage. our MIS department decided (for safety’s sake since i had forwarded the threat made towards lilith to security because it was the SAME voice that left messages on my machine) to exclude helpful contact information for the different departments. all staff names and phone numbers are now no longer available to students/faculty/employees where i work, because someone decided to step over the line.
i also believe that the number of diaries one person can have should be limited.
I agree with kaycee. Some sort of mini court. To decide what’s going on with the situation, and how to peacefully resolve it.
Mmmmm.. Hard question. I personally feel the responsibility for who gets busted for what falls to the site owners and operators. Unfortunately, it’s their site, their web space and a service they offer. I’d be all for the idea of judge and jury except for one fact. Impartiality. It doesn’t exist in this forum. To many people dislike to many others. Even the way people have responded to a certain DD being absentee is indicative of that fact.
I’m sorry, but impartiality is not possible. There’s to much sniping and cliquish behaviour to achieve that, so, still, it’s up to one or two people to determine how their site is run. Not the community as a whole. If so many of these people couldn’t even resolve their between user issues without resorting to petty name calling, not to mention the root of this issue, stalker like behaviour, then how would it be possible to gain a fair, court-like system?