Hey, if we're using a public image as one of the many backgrounds that we have the option to set will it now show up as a blank square with that link missing icon instead of the image?
PS: Man, I JUST redid my diary graphics too. :-D
No, it shouldn't change anything you've already done. It'll just remove it from the list of possibles if you went into the customizer again... At least I think thats how it will do it - LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: musik
i think people should not be allowed to make them public, if they have a graphic set they would like to share they should email them to a particular account to be approved and then put on the system. This way you can control to make sure they include everything (all the buttons needed for navigation etc)
Just a thought :)
Rose
Putting images public requires an approvals process which I go through to allow them to actually become public. Historically if the image loaded and was not offensive it was approved - however given the amount of really quite disastrous images from a web useability point of view that we got, I changed the policy tonight and hence had to revisit the current public images... People had uploaded photo album pictures and for some utterly bizarre reason we'd allowed them to go public...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: MagicWhiskey
Does this mean you are banishing that jarring 5 inch "previous entry button" that's a chihuahua head with beady eyes? Can I start cheering now?
Almost certainly yes :-)