Poly V.Mono
Sat Jan 28 2006

How would you like to be a member of a...harem? A strange thought about what exactly averts modern women of the West from the idea of sharing one man between many? I’d better make a point first, that this is not about the question of polygamy or any other morally-politically exaggerated issues related to the fact of one man letting into his lifespace many women. Lets look into it with the eyes of a woman that might be voluntarily taking part in such arrangement. I would not talk about women of the Middle East either. Although, I’m reminded of my visit to Egypt last year. And my meeting with a local pharaoh and his two wives. Even then it was so noticeable how they both were in total love with him and also how happy he was being a little king of his kingdom. OK, that man in my eyes worth nothing and didn’t impress me much, but these two young girls - they looked so happy together! I almost envied them that moment. Of course, this is completely different culture. When I used to have lengthy discussions with friends, the concept of modern polygamy was explained to me in a simple rule: you can only have few wives, if you are capable to provide them with equal attention. And that’s not just material – gifts, clothes, food. This is also concerning relationships. If you smile to one, you must turn to the other and smile to her too. If you complimented one, the other should be equally complimented, and so on…what amazes me: that women there are quite happy with this policy.

Modern woman of the West obviously cannot accept such “total equality”. Try to imagine what would you feel if you are one of many? Jealousy could be a problem in theory, right? But what if the man indeed gives the same attention to you as he gives to others? (Let’s imagine such an ideal situation, ok?) so, you’re not jealous, you share housework for one between the two or three of you, you’ve got more time for yourself, plus you’ve got your girlfriends “at hand” should you wish to have a girly chat or “pyjamas party”…you don’t need babysitter, as it is easy to share this duty within family. Apart from convenience there are also many other factors that might be beneficial: sharing of experience, sharing of ideas, of skills, of talents…

Now…to put yourself into their place. Imagine an ideal situation, when there are no material obstacles to your happiness or lack of attention from your beloved. Could you really do it? I asked myself: could I do it and if not, then - why?...For me personally the big put off would be to be “one of many”,  to be merged with the others in one “background” so that there is no difference for the man, which way he’ll turn to at any particular moment. It is the equality itself that disturbs me. For the equation is unbalanced: the man gets to divide his love in portions, while women have whole theirs to give. Doesn’t it look like someone gets to collect the most with the least effort? And the other thing I’m personally not comfortable with at all: being one of a few, doesn’t that means – being “averaged”, loosing what’s special about you? Because of course there would be no precedents of treating different women differently…isn’t it a self-esteem killer – never be recognised as a special someone? The phrase “everyone is equal, some are more equal then the others" takes another meaning now…;-) 

So if you were given a chance to join the harem, would you do that? And if not, then – why?
5 Comments
  • From:
    Jagged (Legacy)
    On:
    Sat Jan 28 2006
    Very interesting entry... makes me wonder what made you think of this topic? I recently saw a documentary on a group of polygamous people, some living in Colorado City, others living in BC Canada... it was actually a follow-up from another documentary that I saw 3 years ago... plus I saw another special on polygamous relationships on SEXTV the other night. Do I watch too much TV? Or is this subject for some reason following me?

    I'm not goingto talk about the Colorado City/BC group because I don't think THAT polygamy is what you're talking about (it was religiously-based polygamy practiced by people who believe that men can achieve godly status by taking on many wives and involved women taking a subservient role to men)... but the show on SEXTV talked more about open relationships in which people willingly have relationships with more than one person. And from what I saw, it seems that these relationships work not when the women are thought of as a homogeneous group (averaged out), but rather as individuals. Based on the couples... I mean triples???... I saw interviewed (they had 5 or 6 FF-M partnerships), the women are not averaged out, but are seens as individuals. The women were really different from one another and each brought something different (relationship-wise) to the man... and the women each benefitted from their relationship with one another too, although the viewer got the impression that the females were connected only through the man, and would not have had relationships with one another if it weren't for the man's presence. The women reported that they were happy to share the man because it meant he was a more well-rounded person because of the other woman... they both recognised that they couldn't provide everything the man wanted in a partner, and by allowing him to persue other things with this other partner, it made him a better partner to her (did that sentence make ANY sense??). They did have jealousies and it was challenging at times, but they all said they were happy.

    As for me, I don't think I could share a partner. Not that I expect to fulfill all his relationship needs, but I do want to fulfill all his ROMANTIC relationship needs. I mean, you know, he can have a tennis partner if he wants, but he better not fuck her.

    ;P
  • From:
    Dreammom (Legacy)
    On:
    Sat Jan 28 2006
    well for me it is meany reasons that i would not want that some i wont menten but the big one is
    me and my husband have such a specil bond i think it would take away from that deep closeness. besides my husband would say if the question were posed to him about haveing meay wives or mistresses that one is hard enough to secere a good relatenshipe with let alone more. but the idea of others to help out with things around here would be wonderful as both me and hubby are so under mager presure and over wellemed at times with keeping up with this house hold that at times i with there were two of me.
  • From:
    Pragmatist (Legacy)
    On:
    Sun Jan 29 2006
    No, harem life doesn't appeal. But neither does a monogamous marriage. Tried it once and didn't like it. But I got three good kids out of it.

    Shalom
  • From:
    Kordelle (Legacy)
    On:
    Mon Jan 30 2006
    totally lovely Lana
    what variety in this journal at times it does get kinky ha ha

    one way to interpret this scenario is that ofcourse when we are indoctrinated from childhood to believe in a certain way then ofcourse we desire this way of life and anything else wont be appealing cultural taste is developed
    if we go against this ideal revulsion sets in as a repressive mechanism

    also I think that the western mind ego is power driven we have to dominate everything and posess so much that is marketed and this can be extended even to our relationships

    one of the most loving relationships that I have seen in a married couple was an indian couple where catologue shopping was used familly background and education were critierias used in selecting a partner actually through a catalogue

    if you were bisexual that would add spice to the relationship ha ha

    although this seems wonderful from the outside these harems must have their own unique problems

    personally I have never been married and I dont mind sharing a lover if it is not flaunted ha ha

    also this idea of paying equal attention to each woman may be beautiful theoretically but practically can this work

    also it is hard to believe that given the females natural jealousy ha ha that jealousy could not be a huge problem ofcourse I am viewing this from my western mind nevertheless

    well lovely Lana I want evidence for everything and I am sure that your inquiring scientific mind would also require it

    in my culture there was a tacky expression going around to describe sexual relationships for a while it was

    you can be replaced

    so I guess the king of the harem would say they can be replaced

    I guess the best way to aquire evidence is to try it out ha ha
  • From:
    Windchimes (Legacy)
    On:
    Mon Jan 30 2006
    you're enough to shake out from my self-imposed hibernation. see? i even re-designed my graphics after i read your comment missing me. NO KIDDING!

    thanks for your kind concern.

    no i don't like mono...cuz i prefer.....digital surround or stereo. tee hee! roflmao!

    :)